As I reflect back on writing Inquiry 2, I realized I'm not sure I have my thesis statement written out yet. I have one in mind but I haven't quite figured out how to weave it into the beginning of my paper. I'm thinking it will be, "In response to the movie Pearl Harbor, critics and reviewers attacked the director and producer for their lack of historical accuracy and poor storyline while other viewers, such as WWII vets, appreciated the light they shed on what happened that day in Pearl Harbor." I think my research accurately reflects this and supports many different aspects of this viewpoint. It not only supports that critics attacked the movie, but also talks about those who supported it.
I'm also struggling with integrating a few of my sources that have to do with comparing the Pearl Harbor attacks with the attacks on 9/11. I know I want to put it towards the end but I'm not exactly sure how to relate it back to my thesis.
I want peer responders to address what I should do about my ending? and if the beginning has too much background information?
I'm also struggling with integrating a few of my sources that have to do with comparing the Pearl Harbor attacks with the attacks on 9/11. I know I want to put it towards the end but I'm not exactly sure how to relate it back to my thesis.
I want peer responders to address what I should do about my ending? and if the beginning has too much background information?